Hillary Responds to Court Order, Files New Answers Under Oath, Says She Broke Law Because It Was ‘Convenient’

Hillary Clinton broke the law with her email practices and the government let her off the hook. That’s really not even a question anymore.

The facts clearly back that up. In fact, we are still talking about her emails because she’s been so secretive and evasive about the situation.

On Friday, something new developed.

A judge had ordered Hillary to provide more information about her emails and she did.

Her response was laughable.

From Gateway Pundit:

On Friday morning Hillary Clinton responded to a court order forced by Judicial Watch to answer more questions about the setting up of her private server.

Judicial Watch appeared in a DC federal court last month on a motion to compel more testimony from Hillary Clinton as well as to make public video recordings of depositions of top Clinton aides such as Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills.

The court ruled that Hillary Clinton must answer more questions about the setting up of her private server under oath.

As expected, Hillary Clinton responded to the court order with her usual arrogance — she said she set up the server for “convenience.”

Unreal.

She really doesn’t care at all about how serious this is.

She broke the law. Plain and simple.

From National Review:

There is no way of getting around this: According to Director James Comey (disclosure: a former colleague and longtime friend of mine), Hillary Clinton checked every box required for a felony violation of Section 793(f) of the federal penal code (Title 18): With lawful access to highly classified information she acted with gross negligence in removing and causing it to be removed it from its proper place of custody, and she transmitted it and caused it to be transmitted to others not authorized to have it, in patent violation of her trust. Director Comey even conceded that former Secretary Clinton was “extremely careless” and strongly suggested that her recklessness very likely led to communications (her own and those she corresponded with) being intercepted by foreign intelligence services.

Time to answer for it.

Note: The author of this article has included commentary that expresses an opinion and analysis of the facts.

Leave a Reply

Be the First to Comment!

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of